From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 16 15:28:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847B2CB2D9D for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA_HLL_ISSUER_2016" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589EB1B41 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4526227E for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:28:37 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WHwNbhFaDkjY for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:28:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (inet04.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79B6362277 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:28:35 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=harte-lyne.ca; s=dkim_hll; t=1484580515; bh=3CJdDMgOO1hKV5dtHj5iyYrUKr9u/WWqBjvskQ/AnPw=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Reply-To; b=ie5StdkUlzBykDXbdJItjrWtVgXdga0Jobny+UBaz/oVghfo/Q8+Fgq/FFtONAw5+ qQJz8W2vj6YTL8MSkf6Ne3j/0yeXoJ60lnzhNcLhR0KF75IDmxCV1EbdCjVcTxHhci 6eMJG2/PFXjP6C+QVJ45DQh7S4SatNlwCihkMclqnigrnWzeHjYcg5x2MjT4yO+pAW tw+GLOFmWlUsY/gB5R/CvRgGXlkc18OuFQQ52TbJviR5tY7SjhzcZBOINd2fC5pi/7 +tO7gtXTCmD0tZoC1K3Hkx2njTb3RxCrW44Wu466DA5wXRfuSQXkrCrJP6xkLK8nyF QDPTtHyLTLkOA== Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:28:35 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:28:35 -0500 Subject: Bhyve / jails network response From: "James B. Byrne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:28:44 -0000 I am experimenting with a jailed application, Drupal, hosted on a BHyve VM. Presently this jail responds only to an private IP. Our DNS is set up to respond to the domain name given to this jail and the reverse zone is also set up to properly return the domain assigned to that IPv4. When I ping this address using either the domain or the IP from our LAN I get an immediate response. However, when I ssh into the jail then it seems to take a significant period of time before I get a prompt. I would like to determine the source of this delay. It is an artefact of running a jail on a VM? It is an artefact of sshd running in a jail? It there a DNS issue somewhere? Is running jails on a VM a generally poor implementation choice. In other words should one use either Jails on the hardware host or VMs but not try an run jails within a VM? -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3