From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 20:38:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2510237B401; Sat, 10 May 2003 20:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F7D43FA3; Sat, 10 May 2003 20:38:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with SMTP id <2003051103384805100bt7c0e>; Sun, 11 May 2003 03:38:48 +0000 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 20:38:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20030511024527.GA9150@gothmog.gr> Message-ID: <20030510203753.H665@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <200305110053.h4B0rGd9004467@gothmog.gr> <20030511010700.GA4585@gothmog.gr><20030511021605.GB8548@gothmog.gr> <20030511024527.GA9150@gothmog.gr> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/52041: testing new mdoc-bug class X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 03:38:50 -0000 On Sun, 11 May 2003, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2003-05-10 19:33, Doug Barton wrote: > > On Sun, 11 May 2003, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > I'm adding this class to separate bug reports of the docs/ category to > > > two classes. Those that affect manpages (or other parts of the src/ > > > tree) and those that affect doc/*. > > > > That sounds like a reasonable goal, but wouldn't a category name like > > doc-src (or src-doc) make more sense? There is more documentation in the > > tree than just mdoc. > > I can change it to doc-src or src-doc-bug very easily. The second will > fit nicely among the existing classes but is probably too large to type > manually. I don't really mind if the name is doc-src, src-doc, > src-doc-bug or doc-src-bug. If the extra verbosity isn't too much I'd > prefer the last one: doc-src-bug. Those all sound good to me, my big concern was that if your intention was a category that covered all docs in src that the name reflect that. :) Thanks, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection