From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 10:21:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A8B106564A for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:21:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D168FC13 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5FAJZw1053722; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:19:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m5FAJZIu053719; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:19:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:19:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: perryh@pluto.rain.com In-Reply-To: <4854be53.J2aivLZw9Ipz30je%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Message-ID: <20080615121650.J53706@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080614205751.D35816@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080614210137.GB3520@shepherd> <20080614232908.Y51399@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4854be53.J2aivLZw9Ipz30je%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail's outgoing IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:21:13 -0000 > > Pardon my lack of imagination, but how could anyone -- other > than a spammer -- be generating enough outbound email traffic > to *need* to load-balance it, and yet have little enough > total Internet traffic to be using DSL rather than something > oriented to commercial use (like a T1)? the reason is simple something like "T1" here costs far too much to dedicate it just for mails. for the same price i can get four "4Mbit/s" ADSL's (which i have now), that actually gives 4Mbit/s download speed, but only 512kbps upload. if you substract ACK's needed for 4Mbit/s download, little is left. my ipfw rules manages all this so web browsing works fine, but mail output is a problem now.