Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:26:42 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> To: "Mark W. Krentel" <krentel@dreamscape.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, mbendiks@eunet.no Subject: Re: panic running linux binaries from ext2fs Message-ID: <395CCA42.53199592@cup.hp.com> References: <200006300640.CAA01502@dreamscape.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Mark W. Krentel" wrote: > > I don't normally have any Freebsd binaries on my Linux partitions. > But as a test, I copied a few and ran them. It wasn't a real stress > test, but ls, emacs, xv and xsnow all seemed to run ok on ext2fs. > So, I guess that's not the problem. Thanks. > It seems to require the combination of a Linux binary and ext2fs. > And it's not a complicated Linux binary. I can produce the panic > with Linux's ls. On the other hand, I have successfully run the > Linux versions of emacs and netscape, as long as all the files are > on ufs. ls might be a special case in that it may have too much FS dependent code. A kernel trace should tell us more... > Are there any configuration options for the Linuxulator that I might > have set wrong? I blew away /compat/linux and reinstalled linux_base, > just to make sure it wasn't any additional libs that were the problem. You shouldn't need any options. > Is Linux emulation or ext2fs sensitive to any kernel options (other > than EXT2FS)? I'm not using soft updates, if that matters. The linuxulator currently still depends on COMPAT_43, but that's about it, I guess. If you can send us the last dozen of lines of a ktrace/truss session, then we can start working on this... -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?395CCA42.53199592>