Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 16:37:09 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux? Message-ID: <xzp4qq8h6ju.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405212355001.18976-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> (Daniel Eischen's message of "Sat, 22 May 2004 00:05:31 -0400 (EDT)") References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405212355001.18976-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> writes: > Yet another also, MySQL uses scope system threads by default > instead of scope process threads. Scope process threads seem > to perform better. Excuse me for digressing, but do you threads guys have some kind of occupational nerve damage which prevents you from using correct grammar? Why does everybody insist on talking about "scope system threads" and "scope process threads" instead of system-scope and process-scope threads? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp4qq8h6ju.fsf>