Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:40:13 -0500
From:      Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 4.8 v/s 5.1
Message-ID:  <87he2vmzea.fsf@strauser.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030929025157.5d005b32.b_cassidy@bellsouth.net> (Bryan Cassidy's message of "Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:51:57 -0500")
References:  <20030929025157.5d005b32.b_cassidy@bellsouth.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 2003-09-29T07:51:57Z, Bryan Cassidy <b_cassidy@bellsouth.net> writes:

> which is better for whatever reasons people use it.

Define "better" - I'm not being facetious.  If by "better" you mean "faster
on common hardware and more stable", then you *probably* want 4.x.  If you
mean "has cool new features and should be faster on high-end hardware", then
you *probably* want 5.x.
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser

"94 outdated ports on the box,
 94 outdated ports.
 Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done,
 82 outdated ports on the box."

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/eERS5sRg+Y0CpvERAh8CAJ95OAl6khDg9QoRSkWTyUzVq+5J3QCfa94m
7RTsN36oV8oWWd/RCQwd0Ew=
=8BgM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87he2vmzea.fsf>