From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 23 09:18:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E6E106566C; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3334B8FC14; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA02694; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:18:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RHuCG-0003VS-Hc; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:18:24 +0300 Message-ID: <4EA3DBDF.8060906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:18:23 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111002 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Dupre References: <4EA031F7.7010103@FreeBSD.org> <4EA278EE.4010109@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EA278EE.4010109@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:40:51 +0000 Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: enigmail-thunderbird as an option in thunderbird port X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:18:27 -0000 on 22/10/2011 11:03 Alex Dupre said the following: > Andriy Gapon ha scritto: >> Is it possible and relatively easy to turn emigmail thunderbird extension into >> something like a lightning extension? > > Yes, of course. I think we can drop support for tb 3.6 and put enigmail directly > in tb/sm ports, since now it requires a complete gecko build. > >> The reason for this request is two-fold: >> - it is more convenient when an extension installed from a port is automatically >> available as opposed to having to explicitly install/reinstall a .xpi file > > Actually this is already done by the enigmail port. > Thank you for your work! -- Andriy Gapon