Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:29:50 +0200
From:      KES <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
To:        KES <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Performance loss with dynamic IPFW rules
Message-ID:  <213016870.20081230222950@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <1691697011.20081230214740@yandex.ru>
References:  <1691697011.20081230214740@yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Здравствуйте, KES.

Вы писали 30 декабря 2008 г., 21:47:40:

K> Здравствуйте, Questions.


K>  1 allow all from any to any via rl0
K>  2 allow all from any to any via rl1

K>  109 skipto 110 tcp from any to any 80 in recv $iface #split only http trafic
K>  109 skipto 200 all from any to any #do not split all other trafic
K>  110 check-state
K>  111 prob 0.5 skipto 131 in recv rl2

K>  121 skipto 122 keep-state in recv rl2
K>  123 setfib 0 proto all in recv rl2
K>  125 skipto 150 proto all in recv rl2

K>  131 skipto 132 keep-state in recv rl2
K>  133 setfib 1 proto all in recv rl2
K>  135 skipto 150 proto all in recv rl2

K> I am connected on rl1.
K> INET is rl0, rl1 each 4Mbit/s

K> When I open many connections I get performance loss:
K>  1) Web pages are not opened (it seems flow at start goes through rl0
K>  and then goes rl1. EXPECTED: it flows only through one channel until
K>  closed)
K>  2) I get about 2Mbit/s while downloading something


K>  When I not open many flows I get 8Mbit/s while serfing


K>  What is problem?



Also another interesting behaviour.
Packets with FIB 1 are outgoing through rl0 interface, but must out go
via rl1. Why?

-- 
С уважением,
 KES                          mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?213016870.20081230222950>