Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Aug 2018 14:27:28 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "portmgr@FreeBSD.org" <portmgr@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: RFC: Switching armv7 to WITH_LLD_IS_LD for testing
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfqqk8fd3M5LvpgjYtC6gZraETQuqRMv5asPzVcPM=EtXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2DkAmh1R0N73U0oikR6Cv4QDfDsR2pF%2BwmaeDbW3Em5=A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAPyFy2DkAmh1R0N73U0oikR6Cv4QDfDsR2pF%2BwmaeDbW3Em5=A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote:

> For amd64 I requested (and for i386 continue to request) multiple
> exp-runs with lld as the system linker (/usr/bin/ld) before switching
> the default in src.conf.5.
>
> I'd like to switch armv7 to WITH_LLD_IS_LD; unfortunately we don't
> have an easy way to execute an exp-run for arm (armv7 specifically).
> If there's no objection I would like to enable WITH_LLD_IS_LD for
> armv7, observe a cycle of ports build, with a plan to leave it enabled
> if the build is largely successful, or revert if not.
>
> Comments?
>

My only issue with lld on arm is the bug I'm chasing wrt arm kernel builds
somehow using lld...

But I don't think that's going to affect this one way or another.

I'm happy with it assuming the exp run doesn't reveal some show stopper

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfqqk8fd3M5LvpgjYtC6gZraETQuqRMv5asPzVcPM=EtXQ>