From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 27 17:43:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA25E106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DFF8FC20 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so2300260obb.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:43:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=5wnhmaGDJccfOmOZ18GfGMdlwdn475s6prXfYRcVW9g=; b=koZHfyyflzbVDBlvMSdfrnRzaMg+tbjJj4AkhRtF9JlQAvmDZMkCQDWDZbeECXf5is 5T75Q4a6/yTJMp0lsMWZVBkiMorSJfXIaCVdoF5HIqhnFGqrl/g0WXXsoACRGq36Hr5w vBDRQsgdaS47w/STQVtvggEHmSRFC7hii/UtvV0NTom/9gs8KQJS8mXcfD0DKoIxEYNU HCd/x4SeqYeFI+jwom1oLqtaOUOm5QPu2HOTCwPEhXM7kI46I0Guc4V2fkOJzomcw+mq Qc8y6rx19wKDtJb7TgYaDL9qv/trRABZjIuFd0AP1RJlE28OPTpOtac4nrlx3prxulrV NZYQ== Received: by 10.60.27.6 with SMTP id p6mr21421727oeg.37.1340818987110; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.30.101.53] ([209.117.142.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g3sm30124731oeb.5.2012.06.27.10.43.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <4FEB1F20.8010704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:43:05 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <61AEEA87-2AD8-4174-A282-B093EA12BBA6@bsdimp.com> References: <1340807413.83238.YahooMailClassic@web113515.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4FEB1F20.8010704@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmh9FWWYnwTgf2d+sOJ9w9p8VresmV9EKWUSzhnFAef0tiz6IHF3E+3EkwZ2p/kPx1UEW3d X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:07:19 +0000 Cc: pfg@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:43:07 -0000 On Jun 27, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > So can we please stop pretending that it's me who's the problem, and > start looking at these things rationally? What is your short list of issues? =46rom a high level there appear to = be none, but the devil is in the details, eh? =46rom earlier in the thread, bsdsort and gnu sort are compatible. old, = crunchy, unmaintained gnu sort that we have in the tree isn't compatible = with either new gnu sort nor bsdsort. this means it isn't compatible = with what the linux crowd is using, which is another consideration given = the number of shell scripts that originate there these days. Warner