From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 17 15: 6:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DFA37B618 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:06:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA63442; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:05:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:05:55 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Richard Stanaford Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bioscall.s Message-ID: <20000717150555.A63417@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20000717213203.7240.qmail@web3102.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000717213203.7240.qmail@web3102.mail.yahoo.com>; from rsstan@yahoo.com on Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 02:32:03PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 02:32:03PM -0700, Richard Stanaford wrote: > > Yes, it has been documented all over the place in this mailing list. > > It is also documented in /usr/src/UPDATING. > > > > You should review the expectations of running -STABLE and consider if you > > are better off just sticking with the released product. ..snip.. > And I see nothing regarding bioscall.s. In the 50+ messages on this topic in this mailing list in the past _2_ weeks, some of them _have_ mentioned bioscall.s explicitly. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message