Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:43:53 +0200
From:      Massimo Lusetti <massimo@cedoc.mo.it>
To:        Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
Cc:        Stephen.Clark@seclark.us, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Freebsd Stable 6.x ipsec slower than with 4.9
Message-ID:  <1146123833.4327.2.camel@massimo.datacode.it>
In-Reply-To: <444FAE19.3060404@errno.com>
References:  <444E2503.9090506@seclark.us> <6.2.3.4.0.20060425093417.068dfc08@64.7.153.2> <444E5608.4050704@seclark.us> <6.2.3.4.0.20060425134955.051d58d0@64.7.153.2> <444F750C.7070206@seclark.us>  <444FAE19.3060404@errno.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:30 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:

> There are known locking bottlenecks in the crypto subsystem that fast 
> ipsec depends on.  This is consistent with idle time going up.
> 
> Not sure when they'll be fixed but I know they're important to at least 
> one person.

Sorry to correct but... to at least two persons.

-- 
Massimo
There are more way to do things, one is the bsd-way the others are wrong





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1146123833.4327.2.camel>