From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 26 07:57:11 1994 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id HAA27401 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 26 Dec 1994 07:57:11 -0800 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA27393 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 1994 15:57:02 GMT Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA06904 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Mon, 26 Dec 1994 09:46:06 -0600 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA27653; 26 Dec 94 09:25:29 CST (Mon) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id JAA27650; Mon, 26 Dec 1994 09:25:28 -0600 Message-Id: <199412261525.JAA27650@bonkers.taronga.com> X-Authentication-Warning: bonkers.taronga.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Mark Tinguely Cc: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, roberto@blaise.ibp.fr, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/rc.shutdown (First shot) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Dec 94 09:28:05 CST." <199412261528.AA04045@plains.NoDak.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.4.1 7/21/94 Date: Mon, 26 Dec 1994 09:25:26 -0600 From: Peter da Silva Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I'm about as pro run levels as anyone and even I'm not arguing that. Just that normal shutdown should be more orderly than SIGTERM+10.