From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 13 10:15:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD32DD9DDE4 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp205.alice.it (smtp205.alice.it [82.57.200.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5E771EAA; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (95.250.147.61) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 59633F2403273D8E; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:15:28 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v6DAFQ0n008312; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:15:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: updating cad/opencascade To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gurenchan@gmail.com References: Cc: thierry@FreeBSD.org From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:15:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:15:31 -0000 On 07/13/17 10:02, blubee blubeeme wrote: > Hey > > Is it possible to update cad/opencascade to version 7? Is there any > dependencies on version 6? I've been running 7.1.0 for a long time with no problems (although I only use a small subset of it). I've got a port for it, but it's probably not 100% quality. I had sent it to the maintainer some months ago (it was 7.0 at the time), in case he wanted to have a look, but got no answer. Although having both opencascade6 and opencascade7 in the port tree might be a good idea, I didn't step forward as a candidate maintainer: I think they should both be maintained by the same person. If you are willing to test my port I can send it to you. bye