From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 22 01:51:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2556E37B401 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 01:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (p213.54.196.33.tisdip.tiscali.de [213.54.196.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37B943FDF for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 01:51:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.12.9/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3M8ouGr003174 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:50:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.jennejohn.org) Message-Id: <200304220850.h3M8ouGr003174@peedub.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.3 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Gary Jennejohn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:50:55 +0200 Sender: garyj@jennejohn.org Subject: the future of xemacs21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:51:02 -0000 Hello Porters, xemacs-devel was just repo copied to xemacs to track the stable branch of Xemacs. The question now is, what do we do with xemacs21? xemacs-21.1.14, which is what's in xemacs21, is now considered historical. But there are so many other ports which depend on xemacs21 that it may well be a good idea to keep xemacs21 around and create new ports to track xemacs. So I'd like to get a consensus. Do we delete xemacs21 after all the ports which depend on it are updated to depend on xemacs? Or do we want to keep xemacs21 and add new ports to depend on the new xemacs? Another thing. Who is allowd to modify Mk/bsd.emacs.mk to reflect the creation od editors/xemacs? -------- Gary Jennejohn / garyj@jennejohn.org gj@freebsd.org gj@denx.de