From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 30 16:47:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797A5106566B for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfb@mr-happy.com) Received: from vexbert.mr-paradox.net (vexbert.mr-paradox.net [IPv6:2001:470:b:28:f::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5DC8FC0C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from crow.mr-happy.com (crow.mr-happy.com [10.1.0.2]) by vexbert.mr-paradox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055E5845AD; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:47:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by crow.mr-happy.com (Postfix, from userid 16139) id 3F803BB84; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:47:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:47:48 -0500 From: Jeff Blank To: Steven Hartland Message-ID: <20100130164748.GA71662@mr-happy.com> References: <20100129235911.GA67110@mr-happy.com> <398DD47A113342D78637D600C0C4C47B@multiplay.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <398DD47A113342D78637D600C0C4C47B@multiplay.co.uk> X-Face: #0jV*~a}VtKS-&E/!EJpH('H1Va}24dxF0oT&+.R3Gu8C; xhSC+<|+H84&YLbMvphuRT4cp3.|8EN_(2Eix/6{.Up~u`a^}0Ln&b+9Fw|BPig@-{y\pL_46d&ZwA]5%_AU?}DezfE&1!>H?3E$!Yve7.O<+..Jnb4:'6Ey_]FtFzU9=*l$1p/@gA,Ze>^5<]+r(XJ+m7`/vMDc$'wy|`e X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/10344/Sat Jan 30 03:57:10 2010 on vexbert.mr-paradox.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: kern/141646: [em] em(4) + lagg(4) + vlan(4) generatesISL-tagged frames instead of 802.1q-tagged frames X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:47:49 -0000 On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 01:47:31AM -0000, Steven Hartland wrote: > Since your using lagg there Jeff have you done on perf testing at > all, when I tested here dual em0 + lagg + lacp => cisco 6509 although > all seemed to negotiate correctly, balancing wasn't working at all. Haven't done any perf testing, but I'm using failover, not LACP. Jeff