Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 13:17:05 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net> Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), julian@whistle.com, green@FreeBSD.ORG, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Message-ID: <199907271917.NAA26828@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199907271859.NAA09676@aurora.sol.net> References: <199907271715.LAA25892@mt.sri.com> <199907271859.NAA09676@aurora.sol.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I like the ability at secure level 3 to only reset the counters forward.. > > > It fits in with such things as the "append only" flag. > > > > Then we'd have to implement per-rule counters that default to > > IPFW_VERBOSE_LIMIT but that could be changed to anything. That's a very > > different setup than what we currently have. > > > > (Another thing I just thought of is that this could cause DoS attacks on > > the system if a user compromised root and then set the limit to a very > > high number.) > > This is already possible via sysctl, the VERBOSE_LIMIT variable may be > altered. Can this be altered in securelevel==3? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907271917.NAA26828>