Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 17:11:39 -0400 From: Steve Tremblett <sjt@cisco.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dumb Q: netgraph node init? Message-ID: <20021020171139.B1512@sjt-u10.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210201342150.19091-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>; from julian@elischer.org on Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:43:42PM -0700 References: <20021020141042.B20092@sjt-u10.cisco.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210201342150.19091-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+---- Julian Elischer wrote: | > I have NETGRAPH_ETHER and NETGRAPH_PPPOE in my kernel config. I don't | > start pppoe at boot time. Before ppp is up, ngctl shows ng_ether but | > not pppoe. What defines how ng_ether is loaded and hooked at boot time | > as opposed to ng_pppoe loaded and hooked automatically? | | ng_ether nodes are attached automatically to all exisiting ethernet | interfaces. | ng_pppoe nodes are only created when you ask for one. | | do a 'types' commnad in ngctl to see possible types to make. How does invoking pppd result in the PPPoE node being hooked and initialized? It looks like pppd treats a device called "PPPoE:xl0" as a serial device or am I missing something? Please excuse me if these questions are inappropriate for this list. -- Steve Tremblett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021020171139.B1512>