From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 09:48:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D97016A4CE for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:48:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from msgbas2x.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1tx.cos.agilent.com [192.25.240.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A12E43D67 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:48:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chuck_tuffli@agilent.com) Received: from relcos2.cos.agilent.com (relcos2.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.237]) by msgbas2x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1CB63A3; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:48:22 -0700 (MST) Received: from rtl.rose.agilent.com (rtl.rose.agilent.com [130.30.179.189]) by relcos2.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAD421E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:48:21 -0700 (MST) Received: from cre85086tuf.rose.agilent.com (cre85086tuf [130.30.174.150]) ESMTP id JAA28828; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:48:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by cre85086tuf.rose.agilent.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E633319E291; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:49:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:49:08 -0800 From: Chuck Tuffli To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-ID: <20040115174908.GB17831@cre85086tuf.rose.agilent.com> References: <20040114201854.GB15642@cre85086tuf.rose.agilent.com> <1782565408.1074141449@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <20040115152129.GA17831@cre85086tuf.rose.agilent.com> <2069315408.1074187474@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2069315408.1074187474@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: target driver question X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:48:24 -0000 On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:24:34AM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: ... > The private areas are convenient storage during the lifetime of a CCB. > Your problem is that there is no relationship between the ATIO and > CTIO. I don't think that there would be any problem in rectifyin that > problem. How do you want this rectified? I don't mind doing the work if you point me in a general direction ... -- Chuck Tuffli Agilent Technologies, Storage Area Networking