Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Feb 2020 01:26:10 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r524740 - head
Message-ID:  <20200201012610.GB9754@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <202001311847.00VIlGlL027178@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <202001311847.00VIlGlL027178@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 06:47:16PM +0000, Mark Linimon wrote:
> New Revision: 524740
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/524740
> 
> Log:
>   Remove entry for editors/xed which, even though the name has been
>   brought back but via different sourcebase, still prevents the new
>   port from being built.

What prevents it from being built, why MOVED has anything to do with
the build?  Can you show the excerpt from the failure log?

>   I do not know TRT to annoate in such a case, but at least this
>   will allow the port to build.

Interesting.  So, how do we handle cases like this?  Obviously, names
that once belonged to an old and gone software should be allowed to
recycle, but the MOVED entries for their previous owners should stay
since they still could be resurrected as, e.g., a base for a modern
fork.

I could've renamed the port to xeditor, retaining the PKGNAME and the
category, thus making it shallow move and waived the new MOVED entry,
which allowed to readd previous (now removed) entry, but we'd better
find a more universal way of how to recycle sofware names properly
without losing the previous MOVED history.

We can start with fixing the tools which trip on MOVED entries against
existing ports.  This is wrong, these things are orthogonal.  It looks
like it is some kind of harness against those who accidentally forget
to update MOVED file when due, but it does not make it less wrong, as
it prevents legit cases like this one.  Could we make this thing more
flexible please?

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200201012610.GB9754>