Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:52:58 -0400
From:      "Richard E,. Neese" <r.neese@gmail.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: meta port issue
Message-ID:  <4C3672EA.2020308@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007081456200.5061@yncgbc.qbhto.arg>
References:  <4C363458.6060700@gmail.com> <4C364701.3070406@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007081456200.5061@yncgbc.qbhto.arg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/8/2010 5:56 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Glen Barber wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 7/8/10 4:26 PM, Richard E,. Neese wrote:
>>> Following is not happening
>>>
>>> I have a meta port of /usr/ports/net/freeswitch wich builds and 
>>> installs
>>> other freeswitch ports of -core -sounds -music
>>>
>>> if you type make in the meta port it is not calling up the options
>>> screens for the other ports.
>>>
>>> but if you go into the other ports of freeswitch-core -sounds -music 
>>> and
>>> type make the options screens come up fine.
>>>
>>> it seems that meta porta are broken in the mk files
>>
>> You can use 'make config-recursive' to display all the configuration 
>> option screens.
>
> The fact that you can work around it doesn't mean that it's not a bug.
>
> :)
>
> Doug
>
yes but most new people installing ports dont know this... and the issue 
is to find out why make install is not working correctly.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C3672EA.2020308>