Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:55:58 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) Message-ID: <45FA154E.1020508@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <17913.28165.431770.541129@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20070315153120.GDJ2045.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> <17913.28165.431770.541129@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Huff wrote: > Vizion writes: > >> I do not know about that.. If there is a refusal to keep the port >> in the tree then the folks at OpenOffice will HAVE to do >> something about it. > > They will? Why? > While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously > create bad feelings, FreeBSD machines are a small fraction of the > current (and potential) user base. They could blow off FreeBSD - > heck, *BSD - first thing tomorrow and not notice. > OpenOffice.Org is under no obligation to FreeBSD, or its users, > whatsoever. Of course ... if you want to step up and contribute > patches (or pay someone to do so) then this will get corrected. > Welcome to the underside of open source software. > > > Robert Huff What about the Seamonkey headers break OpenOffice though? Sheesh, the OpenOffice people should know that it's an unsupported browser and bad to have sitting around on a machine for security reasons (riddled with security bugs). Provide me with the perfunctory necessary patches and stuff, and I'll give compiling it a go with Seamonkey's headers. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45FA154E.1020508>