From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 06:49:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A15716A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 06:49:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from telecom.net.et (sparrow.telecom.net.et [213.55.64.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0DF43D2F for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 06:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mtm@identd.net) Received: from [213.55.68.226] (HELO rogue.acs.lan) by telecom.net.et (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8) with ESMTP id 62460045; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 09:42:10 +0300 Received: by rogue.acs.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D6C0CB86E; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:49:00 +0300 (EAT) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:48:59 +0300 From: Mike Makonnen To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20041109064859.GA69017@rogue.acs.lan> References: <20041108005007.GB57736@gothmog.gr> <20041108105120.GA952@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20041108114402.GA2910@rogue.acs.lan> <20041108143336.GB784@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041108143336.GB784@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/6.0-CURRENT (i386) cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC (fwd) Re: 5.3 tmpfs mount permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 06:49:42 -0000 On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 04:33:36PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2004-11-08 14:44, Mike Makonnen wrote: > > I haven't tested it, but I don't see anything obviously wrong with it. > > > > Cheers. > > How about this one? There are no tricky parts in mount_md() anymore and the > tmpfs_flags variable is passed to mdmfs. I just rebooted with it, with > tmpfs=30m and tmpfs=YES in my rc.conf and all seemed to work fine. > > I've kept the tmpsize and varsize options too. I know they can be replaced by > a properly tweaked tmpmfs_flags, but this isn't really necessary. Yes, this one looks better. Forget what I said about refactoring. I misread the diff and thought there were two mount_md() type routines. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | Fingerprint: AC7B 5672 2D11 F4D0 EBF8 5279 5359 2B82 7CD4 1F55 mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - Unleash the Daemon !