From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 18 20:35:33 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A4216A41A for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:35:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@FreeBSD.org) Received: from heff.fud.org.nz (203-109-251-39.static.bliink.ihug.co.nz [203.109.251.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C76C13C478 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:35:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@FreeBSD.org) Received: by heff.fud.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 49FA27E89; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:21:53 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:21:53 +1300 From: Andrew Thompson To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071218202153.GF85906@heff.fud.org.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: pf eratta X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:35:33 -0000 Hi, I had someone ask if we are affected by eratta 004 here, http://openbsd.org/errata42.html Our pf is at version 4.1 so this may have been introduced afterwards, anyone know for sure? cheers, Andrew