Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 08:49:59 -0400 From: Mike <mike.patterson@unb.ca> To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: deskutils/logjam, deskutils/logjam2 Message-ID: <40A36EF7.4000209@unb.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040513013706.GB69406@isis.wad.cz> References: <20040513013706.GB69406@isis.wad.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roman Neuhauser wrote: > logjam is logjam-3.0.4, logjam2 is logjam-4.4.0, the former has > obviously been withdrawn from the distribution site. shouldn't > the deskutils/logjam2 port be moved into deskutils/logjam? the name > certainly doesn't make any sense. I didn't create either of the original ports, nor am I the maintainer of the logjam port. Having said that, 3.0.4 is the last stable version that does not require GTK2. I think there are still some people who would favour that version, although I'm sure Joe would have something to say about that. Having said *that*, it appears that 3.0.4 is indeed now gone from the logjam download page, so the point may be moot. If it's decided that 3.0.4 should stay on, I'm willing to find a copy of the original source tarball and host it. Otherwise, I guess the 3.0.4 version should be removed from ports, but I've no idea what the ramifications are of changing port names. (Removing original poster from Cc: list as his .signature seems to imply he desires. :-) ) Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40A36EF7.4000209>