From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 9 15:20: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7540A37BEE9 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA45558; Tue, 9 May 2000 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200005092220.PAA45558@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ville Eerola Subject: Re: ports/18446: Upgrade for fetchmail port Reply-To: Ville Eerola Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/18446; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ville Eerola To: Daniel Hagan Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/18446: Upgrade for fetchmail port Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 01:13:38 +0300 (EEST) Daniel Hagan writes: > This PR was closed by Kris, but the issue was reported as being resolved > in 5.3.8 (as opposed to 5.3.0 in ports). I upgraded the fetchmail port to > 5.3.8 and dropped the patches that didn't appear to be necessary. If the > originator and maintainer would look over the upgrade, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, but I have already submitted an upgrade for the fetchmail port to version 5.3.8. I did intentionally submit a separate PR, whose number is ports/18456. Regards, Ville -- Ville Eerola | Powered by ve@sci.fi | FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message