Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:03:36 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Hans Petter Selasky" <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: usb@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP new usb code coming in. Message-ID: <op.uf6z8akx9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <200808192257.13576.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <20080819194413.GB16977@elvis.mu.org> <48AB32D4.5040904@FreeBSD.org> <200808192257.13576.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:57:11 -0500, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> wrote: > On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> > Q. Can we change the name from "usb2_" to my favorite name? >> > A. No. This is for a short period, stop being so annoying. >> >> Why not just "usb_"? You can then leave it as is then avoiding violating >> POLA second time. Otherwise people would confuse it with USB 2.0. >> > > Else you get symbol collisions with the old USB stack ... At least, can you document it? Like add an explain about that usb2 is just a name, not USB 2.0, that way no users can mistake it for USB 2.0. Even smarter people can mistake it for USB 2.0, btw. Cheers, Mezz > --HPS -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.uf6z8akx9aq2h7>