From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 00:41:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBF6106568D for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4745F8FC1E for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so719591ewy.19 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:41:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2zGQzZ8uP4moKokE+dZr7YcyIL1iekFlSKMhQQnTnrs=; b=uRdlxS6wftK+nEPaj++3TeJuUTggNcKtSMNlB4S+XN63PfM3VmjMfqIwiK9nPQVlOT ANHoxrad0THjbBMlwhgJNOdTaeH/vGhVfysODep3bvvbRYHO46khIHzysM7InMeBCqCx rWCIvy4yd/YqUg6KRPQ0JlPaF9tJLLKEooT/I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DBGazFmJv+/xKoue16s9Bf9ew/B+Ll9wp+bxnDlZVqieIPr60ZGD1pIYuIl82xdLJ5 JHr5Dq71n/bFVrJvMe5lT8NUk6wzsZpgwEXfxL/VaCUSqYHRK1LhR8dhdwv7IA6f/S+E LI1I7qSRPaejST0yWT0/xN6GMygR4yH/E9w+Q= Received: by 10.210.141.17 with SMTP id o17mr639140ebd.195.1232930474432; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z34sm3749351ikz.22.2009.01.25.16.41.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:41:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:41:10 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090126004110.3d6721dc@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20090125224654.GB4568@phenom.cordula.ws> References: <20090125214457.GA4568@phenom.cordula.ws> <8cb6106e0901251422q1412ed38gd14f7591d4dfcabd@mail.gmail.com> <20090125224654.GB4568@phenom.cordula.ws> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: make -jN build with portmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:41:16 -0000 On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:46:54 +0100 cpghost wrote: > That's a good hint indeed. I'll try it. Maybe I'll modify it a bit to > include ONLY the "build" target, because -jN fails on nearly every > other target, AFAICS. Don't forget that there are two different makes; BSD make does the ports infrastructure bit, and usually gmake (Gnu Make) does the actual build and install in the work directory. IIRC MAKE_ARGS only goes to the lower-level make (gmake), and aside from those ports that don't work with -j at all, the failure with other targets are caused by bsd make i.e. by trying to run the whole ports infrastructure with -j.