From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sat Feb 13 23:55:21 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7A1540170; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DdS0n07JCz3lKs; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9IvV7x0YgBQ8JHHXbCYaejJJveUV55hjRqMJ/O2omOI=; b=gXIoKOSYHRp/4yWoh0F9QvdWvq G9j4EdJKpxSn2IIki+30aHPORV34carkOQefGcug0S3RxnY/Cv3mfSb/AGJe5mFvwqyGCxjUDbwOJ VtmLA17/6ap4k2WZ+A11jkh7vig5UPsnkpuSGEKjF/2NUEva3r96ic0YyddM6aXxNWqA=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lB4ku-00A3ce-Q2; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:55:16 -0700 Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.68]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1lB4kt-00068a-4N; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:55:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAFD5006A4; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:55:14 -0700 (MST) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta4.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta4.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5e4oRfy_6aqI; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:55:14 -0700 (MST) Received: from [10.0.10.142] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AECD8500CEF; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:55:14 -0700 (MST) To: Gerald Pfeifer , Jan Beich , Rebecca Cran Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201909100151.x8A1pqC5086268@repo.freebsd.org> <1746825a-d196-9390-6c71-45918862e985@freebsd.org> <704b6093-69e0-57aa-c56b-33b558dd32ad@pfeifer.com> From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <1e3be017-8a27-7a20-3340-2ebc035e2ff7@bsdio.com> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:55:13 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <704b6093-69e0-57aa-c56b-33b558dd32ad@pfeifer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-XM-SPF: eid=1lB4kt-00068a-4N; ; ; mid=<1e3be017-8a27-7a20-3340-2ebc035e2ff7@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.68; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa05.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,NICE_REPLY_A,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001, TooManyTo_002 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5084] * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa05 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa05 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Gerald Pfeifer , Jan Beich , Rebecca Cran X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 815 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.07 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (1.3%), b_tie_ro: 9 (1.2%), parse: 0.93 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 10 (1.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.93 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.3 (0.4%), tests_pri_-950: 1.04 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 0.83 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 89 (10.9%), check_bayes: 87 (10.7%), b_tokenize: 4.9 (0.6%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (0.7%), b_comp_prob: 1.57 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 71 (8.7%), b_finish: 1.21 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 686 (84.2%), check_dkim_signature: 0.83 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 195 (23.9%), poll_dns_idle: 191 (23.5%), tests_pri_10: 2.3 (0.3%), tests_pri_500: 8 (1.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: svn commit: r511727 - head/sysutils/uefi-edk2-qemu X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DdS0n07JCz3lKs X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:55:21 -0000 On 2/13/21 3:47 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, Jan Beich wrote: >> Rebecca Cran writes: >>>> Only lang/gcc (meta port) installs "gcc" symlink. Why not keep USE_GCC >>>> while using the same hack as sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve or misc/seabios? >>> Oh, I see the problem. It should be >>> gcc${GCC_DEFAULT}:lang/gcc${GCC_DEFAULT}. >>> >>> I'm not sure what hack you're referring to: how do those ports avoid >>> pulling in gcc as a dependency while still using USE_GCC? >> USE_GCC= yes >> ... >> .include >> RUN_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS:Ngcc*} > > Even better -- and I am sorry it took me so long to get this into the > ports infrastructure (Mk/bsd.gcc.mk) -- should be a simple > > USE_GCC=yes:build > > This essentially is a variation of what Jan proposed, just with the > new ":build" parameter instead of manipulating RUN_DEPENDS directly. > > Okay to commit? Yes, please do. -- Rebecca Cran