Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Aug 2006 02:23:02 +0800
From:      "jan gestre" <freebsd.ph@gmail.com>
To:        "Svein Halvor Halvorsen" <svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: portsdb output and portaudit question
Message-ID:  <a25afc300607311123u5f7e6f24taab3f176afd6ea7a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44CE47F0.8020505@lvor.halvorsen.cc>
References:  <a25afc300607311057s6072667bsf14671c83c609813@mail.gmail.com> <44CE47F0.8020505@lvor.halvorsen.cc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/1/06, Svein Halvor Halvorsen <svein.h@lvor.halvorsen.cc> wrote:
>
> jan gestre wrote:
> > i was trying to portupgrade ruby coz portaudit is complaining of
> > vulnerabilities, i did run cvsup and portsdb -Uu before portupgrade, at
> > first i couldn't upgrade ruby coz portupgrade is complaining maybe coz
> > portaudit but someone in the list suggested this:
> >
> > # portupgrade -Rr -m DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES="yes" ruby
> >
> > whoala it installed the ruby package but still portaudit complains even
> > though the installed version is current which has no vulnerability. is
> this
> > normal? any way to fix these?
>
>
> This is expected behavior. The ports system will let you upgrade a
> vulnerable port without complaint. It will however complain if you try
> to install (or upgrade to) a version that has vulnerabilities. Since
> portupgrade complained, it's no surprise that portaudit also complains
> after the forced upgrade.
>
> This means that either the version in ports aren't fixed yet (the
> existence of a vulnerability of a prior version does not imply that said
> vulnerability is fixed in the current version), or that your ports tree
> is out of date. Seeing that the latter is not true, I would say you
> just have to wait for an updated version to appear in ports.
>
> You can create an account at freshports and ad ruby to your "watch
> list". That means you'll get notified when new versions arrive.
>
>
>  i portupgrade the previous version ruby-1.8.4_8,1 to the current version
> which is ruby-1.8.4_9,1 and i also saw from the portaudit complaint that
> the new version is not anymore affected by the vulnerabilities of the old
> version meaning the maintainer already fixed this, however portaudit is
> still complaining. and how about the portsdb output? why is it complaining
> of stuff i don't have installed?



TIA



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a25afc300607311123u5f7e6f24taab3f176afd6ea7a>