From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 12 21:32:55 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716381065676
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 May 2008 21:32:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com)
Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com
	[64.81.227.250])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2410A8FC15
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 May 2008 21:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com)
Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com
	(dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id
	m4CLWjnI065080; Mon, 12 May 2008 16:32:45 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com)
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080512163401.026387f8@mail.computinginnovations.com>
X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:34:33 -0500
To: Christer Solskogen <solskogen@carebears.mine.nu>,
	freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com>
In-Reply-To: <g0aa89$q0p$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <g07lip$736$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<6.0.0.22.2.20080511190114.0264af00@mail.computinginnovations.com>
	<g09t4u$ads$1@ger.gmane.org> <g0a0aa$lip$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<6.0.0.22.2.20080512153543.02665c88@mail.computinginnovations.com>
	<g0aa89$q0p$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080512-0, 05/12/2008), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93/6806/Wed Apr 16 15:50:16 2008 on
	betty.computinginnovations.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for
	more information
X-MailScanner-ID: m4CLWjnI065080
X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com
X-Spam-Status: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: 
Subject: Re: arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:32:55 -0000

At 03:44 PM 5/12/2008, Christer Solskogen wrote:
>Derek Ragona wrote:
>
>>You may want to do traceroutes from the systems that do find the 0.0.0.0 
>>interface.  I would bet you have a default route and/or netmask sending 
>>the traffic.  You will get those arp messages if you run two different 
>>interfaces on the same system, on the same subnet (not to be confused 
>>with running multiple IP's on an interface.)  Arp tries to tie an IP 
>>address to a machine address, but if the reverse routing isn't correct 
>>you will see these error messages.
>
>A tip from George Davidovich setting the aliases to use netmask to 
>0xffffffff seems to fix the problem.
>
>--
>chs

Yes aliases should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255

         -Derek

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.