Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:01:43 +0200
From:      "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de>
To:        Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name
Message-ID:  <44ACD177.1000204@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <20060706011015.GA6677@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
References:  <44AC5D39.4010502@gmx.de> <20060706011015.GA6677@odin.ac.hmc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> I normally run the command
>> #  pkg_version -Iv | grep \<
>> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I got the following output:
>>
>> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00  <   needs updating (index has 1.5.0.07.00)
>>
>> It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name.
> 
> Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is
> "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00".  That's
> just plain bogus.
> 
> -- Brooks
> 

So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44ACD177.1000204>