Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:06:21 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
To:        CZUCZY Gergely <gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu>
Cc:        freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pf (+ relayd?) as lvs replacement
Message-ID:  <20080425170324.H16673@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20080425092706.2a977670@twoflower.in.publishing.hu>
References:  <402f78990804242338v5c2d6e95yaf73382878f8c26@mail.gmail.com> <20080425092706.2a977670@twoflower.in.publishing.hu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help



On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, CZUCZY Gergely wrote:

> Hello,
>
> A somewhat similar can be achived using relayd, but this kind of load 
> balancing shouldn't be done on L2/L3 level. This kind of load balancing 
> should be done on Layer7 with some application level load balancers. 
> That way you can also do more then this (like sanitizing the requests 
> before they get to the actual servers).
>
> Some projects exists out there to do this, like pound[1], or also nginx has
> some features for this propose, and even apache2.2 is being extended into this
> direction.

Most of these projects don't have IPv6 support, whil pf has IPv6 support 
builtin. We are using pf for load balancing HTTP for more than a years 
now, successfully.

Best Regards,


Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080425170324.H16673>