From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Aug 6 18:23:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from bubba.whistle.com (bubba.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49A537BCBF for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 18:23:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA04980; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 18:23:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <200008070123.SAA04980@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: 4.0RELEASE and 3COM589EC In-Reply-To: <200008062053.OAA26582@harmony.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Aug 6, 2000 02:53:45 pm" To: Warner Losh Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 18:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Warner Losh writes: > : - on first insertion: No IRQ!! > : - on others insertion: No I/O space!! > > NO IRQ means that you've failed to pick a IRQ line that is free. Pick > another one and don't list that one in the irq line. The NO I/O space > means that either ep has a bug when it allocates I/O space and doesn't > attach, or that pccardd is trying to allocate things such that it is > stomping on the I/O space that's already in use. Just curious.. How far are we from having the IRQ selection process be totally automatic, i.e. no user input or intervention required? Doesn't the kernel know what IRQ's are in use or free? Or is there some BIOS related complication? -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message