Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:36:11 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r279030 - in head/sys: net netinet netinet6 Message-ID: <20150223173611.GC15484@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20150223175602.251053a0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <201502192316.t1JNGALg060789@svn.freebsd.org> <20150223175602.251053a0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:56:02PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: T> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 23:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote: T> > Author: glebius T> > Date: Thu Feb 19 23:16:10 2015 T> > New Revision: 279030 T> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279030 T> > T> > Log: T> > Now that all users of _WANT_IFADDR are fixed, remove this crutch and T> > hide ifaddr, in_ifaddr and in6_ifaddr under _KERNEL. T> T> There are reports that net-snmp is broken now. Removal of a userland T> interface should get a ports exp-run. T> T> Grepping the ports tree for _WANT_IFADDR brings up these: T> T> devel/libgtop/Makefile:CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include T> -DHAVE_NET_IF_VAR_H -D_WANT_IFADDR T> net-mgmt/net-snmp/Makefile:CFLAGS+= -D_WANT_IFADDR T> T> Can you have a look at them? I will. Sorry for problems. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150223173611.GC15484>