Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:07:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com> To: "Joshua Coombs" <jcoombs@gwi.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 available Message-ID: <1422.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129082866.squirrel@172.16.0.1> In-Reply-To: <digtbv$9jk$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <434BCDF6.3090303@samsco.org> <digpfu$r1b$1@sea.gmane.org> <434BEC96.4050801@samsco.org> <digtbv$9jk$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, October 11, 2005 1:39 pm, Joshua Coombs wrote: > > "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org> wrote in message > news:434BEC96.4050801@samsco.org... > >> Joshua Coombs wrote: >> >> >>> Given that we're in the RC stage, is it too late to get a PR >>> stuffed in to correct ntpd/ntpdate behavior in /etc/rc.d? >>> >>> Joshua Coombs >>> >>> >> >> Depends on the kind of problem that you are seeing. Any details? >> >> >> Scott >> > > Two issues I spotted. > > > First, ntpdate is still being used, despite it being marked as > depreciated for quite some time. The preferred replacement is to call ntpd > with the -q switch. This causes ntpd to match ntpdate's behavior, it sets I like my ntpdate command, and im not about to change all my scripts and configure some ntpd servers just to quickly sync the time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1422.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129082866.squirrel>