From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 20 18:18:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBDA16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:18:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A291C43D2D for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 40D9914925; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:18:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:18:15 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Kirill Ponomarew In-Reply-To: <20050320141638.GH61320@voodoo.oberon.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/79010: [patch] bsd.port.mk - all-depends-tree target X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:18:16 -0000 On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Done, it takes too long though, I needed 16s to create tree in > x11/xterm, with Athlon XP2400: My guess is that this is not necessarily a problem with this patch. ISTR something on the order of an average of .3ss/'make describe' the last time I investigated performance issues here. xterm probably has one of the deeper trees. mcl