From owner-freebsd-isdn Thu Oct 8 17:39:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA01485 for freebsd-isdn-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 17:39:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sockratte.schell.de (polz.de [195.20.238.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA01457 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 17:39:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sas@schell.de) Received: from guerilla.foo.bar (hennen32s.iserlohn.netsurf.de [194.195.194.226]) by sockratte.schell.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA28546; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 02:39:29 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.foo.bar [127.0.0.1]) by guerilla.foo.bar (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA12442; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 02:39:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 02:39:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Sascha Schumann To: Ignatios Souvatzis cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Markus_D=F6hr?= , Gary Jennejohn , freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: setting up leased line to ISP In-Reply-To: <19981008235546.A391@jocelyn.rhein.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 11:08:10PM +0200, Markus Döhr wrote: > > >>Markus Döhr writes: > > >>will there be any support for leased line > > >>in i4b in the future? > > > > > >Gary Jannajohn writes > > >only if someone who has a leased line implements it :-) > > > > I WOULD try ... > > > > now it's the question, what I need to get the code up > > and running... > > > > I mean, specification of what is 'leased line'... > > > > any suggestions? > > AFAIK (but thats no hard knowledge), a German "D64S" line is just like a > S0 bus, without the D channel signalling. Access the B channel and talk. > D64S2 (or however the 128kbit variant is called) would use both B channels. > > Somebody should verify this peeking at i4l, I think there is D64S support > for them. The simplest solution would be to use i4l then. i4l has support for this kind of leased line for at least one year, so it should be pretty stable. But, if someone does this because of the `hack value' ... ;) Is there any benefit over using a simple router and attaching a computer on this as a 2nd router? We are using such a setup here and we didn't have to worry about the leased line at all ISP <-D64S-> Cisco <-eth-> Bastion host <-eth-> Intranet Sascha (remembering the 1TR6 specification, once bought, hardly used) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message