From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 9 9:12:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB97615210 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 09:12:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p28-dn02kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [210.163.200.125]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) with ESMTP id BAA10550; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 01:12:09 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37FF68EC.6A128A83@newsguy.com> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 01:10:20 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jacques Vidrine Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable References: <19991009100231S.nectar@nectar.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -Stable must be stable. Breaking interface is not acceptable if we want to attract and _keep_ 3rd-party developers. I'm not sure placing this stuff as an option is viable. We don't have "options" when compiling the kld modules, so how would they know if they should use the newer or the older interface? My take is: don't commit it to RELENG_3. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "I always feel generous when I'm in the inner circle of a conspiracy to subvert the world order and, with a small group of allies, just defeated an alien invasion. Maybe I should value myself a little more?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message