From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 01:11:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B57FBC4650 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:11:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from un_x@earthlink.net) Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B8618C4 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:11:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from un_x@earthlink.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=Ak+ur2z/dnLq6ZLMM5Pe7c5LNp/AQxJZ4sp5aU3byhb7wyn66vhr4FhpH7AevG1q; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:X-Mailer:Message-ID:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [72.251.118.157] (helo=smtpauth.earthlink.net) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1bcjBs-00039P-Us for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:10:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:09:59 -0800 From: "CK" To: Cc: Subject: FreeBSD/Xorg/Openchrome Segfault Reply-To: "CK" X-Mailer: UMail v1.0 Message-ID: X-ELNK-Trace: b339fc8a95da5b464d2b10475b571120d51c1938c9530a7a54b5f29d5b4a796d9e2fc8bc6e383c1e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 72.251.118.157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:11:54 -0000 What kind of dumbass reply is this? Why even bother to make such a reply? What do you know about anything? FYI, I have been running FreeBSD for over 20 years, and spent over 1/2 a decade helping people on this maillist from 1995-2000+, and my "business" is not for monetary gain, it is for the benefit of people and this world, on extremely critical+serious technological topics that few in the world could understand, while I barely sustain on less than $4000/year. I've been busy trying to research this problem while Steve made a reply. I have half a website dedicated to FreeBSD code in service to others. Please, don't reply with further asshole comments like this, it serves no purpose other than broadcasting your ignorance+idiocy. Toodle-pip - very effeminate. > Frank Shute frank at woodcruft.co.uk > Wed Aug 24 21:20:15 UTC 2016 > >> The reason I asked the previous question to this list is: >> >> 1. It is difficult to believe a non-functional graphics driver >> (openchrome) could get into the Xorg packaging system without >> proper functioning being tested and verified. >> >> 2. It would appear to be an openchrome problem, but I thought >> maybe it could be due to the GCC->Clang transition. > >You've made a whole pile of assumptions there that may or may not be true. > >Steve politely pitched it to you that you were using an archaic application on >an archaic version of an OS for an architecture that not a lot of people use >these days and you may be advised to upgrade your system and/or application >software. > >I don't know why but I didn't receive a copy of your reply to him thanking him >for his observations and spending his time on the matter. > >> Anyway, this has totally 'screwed' my business, since all >> machines use this driver, and none have a windowing system now. > >I'm sure you'll be happy to point out what contributions you or your business >have made to FreeBSD. > >Feel free to post URLs of commits you have made to src, ports or docs. Any >monetary contributions you have made to the Foundation or to port maintainers >who maintain the ports your business depends on. > >Even answers to other user's questions on this list that you have made would >be a start.... > >Until then: best of luck with your business! > >Toodle pip! >-- >Frank >https://woodcruft.co.uk/