Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:02:30 +0200 From: Erik Scholtz <escholtz@argonsoft.de> To: Jurgen Weber <jurgen.weber@theiconic.com.au> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clustered file systems Message-ID: <504F1A46.60509@argonsoft.de> In-Reply-To: <504E627C.70408@theiconic.com.au> References: <504E627C.70408@theiconic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jurgen, I'm facing the same problem (that's why I wrote this article on my blog), and the only solution was to migrate from FreeBSD to CentOS (my choice - others are also possible). Up to now, there is no Cluster FS for FreeBSD and imho there isn't even a project with this target active. That's why I'm thinking, that the best OS in this world will die in future. Clustering features are key features these days. If anyone has another idea or information, I'm also very interested in this! Greetings, Erik -- My blog: http://blog.elitecoderz.net Am 10.09.12 23:58, schrieb Jurgen Weber: > Guys > > I require a SAN solution for a mail server implementation I am > designing. The design I am looking for is the following: > > https://www.communigate.com/cgatepro/ClusterDynamic.html#OSCluster > > This means I require some sort of SAN storage managed by a clustered FS, > having very little SAN + ClusterFS experience I am research the options > available to me. FreeBSD being my OS of choice but I found the following: > > http://blog.elitecoderz.net/cluster-filesystem-for-freebsd-gfs-ocfs2/2010/06/ > > > This blogger mentions that their is no Clustered FS support at this > point in time for FreeBSD which I find astonishing but I have been > unable to find anything except for a GlusterFS port using fuse (not ideal). > > Any thoughts or suggestions appreciated. > > Thanks >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?504F1A46.60509>