From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 16:25:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE101065675; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:25:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053338FC23; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:25:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.166.22] ([68.0.14.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0TGOZZK062435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:24:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Alex Goncharov In-Reply-To: References: <6B7ABE80-35AB-4C44-B5A4-200E10DCC3AC@airwired.net> <49819BD5.5040709@FreeBSD.org> <1233236412.1779.40.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <1233238367.1779.47.camel@wombat.2hip.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+6Qnms2UDT760wzFvqvt" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:25:12 -0500 Message-Id: <1233246312.1766.17.camel@wombat.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, danallen46@airwired.net, bms@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:25:37 -0000 --=-+6Qnms2UDT760wzFvqvt Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:25 -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote: > ,--- You/Robert (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:12:47 -0500) ----* > | Problem is, it isn't just the Xserver... All of the pieces are > | intertwined and so in many cases to update Xserver you also need to > | update some/several libraries as well as all of your drivers. Xorg is > | about 60 or 70 ports now. >=20 > That can be handled, it seems to me. >=20 > My current port upgrade problem is that I cannot csup the tree and get > the old X to rebuild dependent components. >=20 > | FWIW, I have Xserver 1.6 and xrandr bits that are rc already... as well > | as a new intel driver that I don't want to update without xserver 1.6. >=20 > I would be willing to test 1.6 on my many different machines, provided > there is a clear and inexpensive (< 2 hours) path to a rollback. I'll assemble a patch as soon as I can get to it. From where we are now in ports, the only thing that has to be updated that I can think of is the server, then rebuild your drivers. robert. > -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net -- --=-+6Qnms2UDT760wzFvqvt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkmB2GgACgkQM4TrQ4qfROOPPgCfYlUDpxPzq5ApJ6P035jHCQJD yD4AnishTNQhw6x/00H0IHJK/tPRD8BZ =pF/g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+6Qnms2UDT760wzFvqvt--