Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:35:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Thomas Abthorpe <tabthorpe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/komodo-ide Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <20101128123502.GA79032@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201011261932.oAQJWOLf081257@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201011261932.oAQJWOLf081257@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 07:32:24PM +0000, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > tabthorpe 2010-11-26 19:32:24 UTC > > Modified files: > editors Makefile > Added files: > editors/komodo-ide Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > Log: > IDE specialized in dynamic languages like TCL, Python, PHP, Ruby, Perl > Also a web editor (JS/CSS/HTML/XML) > > This port installs the linux commercial version. Please readd it as linux-komodo-ide then. Actually, I do not really see much differences between this port and komodo-edit. The similarities in Makefiles also suggest if they cannot be merged to one port (named linux-komodo) they at least should had been repocopied. Linux binary ports should be layout like this: port directory linux-foo PORTNAME foo CATEGORIES <primary category> linux PKGNAMEPREFIX linux- Last, but not least, `editors' is a bad category name. IDEs and "code processors" should be put in `devel', see for Anjuta and KDevelop. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101128123502.GA79032>