Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 Nov 1995 22:44:16 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        cimaxp1!jb@werple.net.au (John Birrell)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org, jb@cimlogic.com.au
Subject:   Re: ideas from netbsd
Message-ID:  <199511080544.WAA19303@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199511080508.QAA16175@werple.net.au> from "John Birrell" at Nov 8, 95 04:12:37 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> My understanding of the way things are:
> >> 
> >> NetBSD  "thread environment" = CAP's pthreads code including CAP's
> >> thread safe libc.
> >> 
> >> FreeBSD "thread environment" = CAP's pthreads code including CAP's
> >> thread safe libc.
> > 
> > Your understanding is incorrect according to Julian's post under this
> > same subject.
> 
> Not it's not! What Julian mentioned is what _we_ are currently doing.
> As far as 2.0 and 2.1 are concerned, pthreads is a port.
> 
> For 2.2 I'm building a threaded libc here and feeding diffs to Julian for
> inclusion in the main tree when appropriate. I'm still talking with CAP about
> the integration of thread support in libc. This discussion includes Julian.

I meant with regard to the NetBSD and FreeBSD sources both being based
on CAP's libc code.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511080544.WAA19303>