Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 08:27:36 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>, net@FreeBSD.org, "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEAD UP: non-MPSAFE network drivers to be disabled (was: 8.0 network stack MPsafety goals (fwd)) Message-ID: <20080527062736.GF64397@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <42521.1211829076@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20080526161608.GE64397@hoeg.nl> <42521.1211829076@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > In message <20080526161608.GE64397@hoeg.nl>, Ed Schouten writes: >=20 > >The new TTY layer should still support line disciplines, [...] >=20 > Actually... I think it shouldn't. With the word `should' I meant that it would still be possible to implement multiple line disciplines with the mpsafetty code. But I really think line disciplines should go. What should happen with the NETGRAPHDISC? --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkg7qdgACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWzpQCfWdegx1c9kAwnf8pgIVheii53 g0wAn21RUzpMiDVW7mZXUBM35wf154Wl =054i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080527062736.GF64397>