From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 18 00:05:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA19681 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:05:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cons.org (knight.cons.org [194.233.237.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA19672; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:05:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cracauer@cons.org) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by cons.org (8.8.8/8.7.3) id JAA02288; Fri, 18 Sep 1998 09:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19980918090503.A2274@cons.org> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 09:05:03 +0200 From: Martin Cracauer To: Satoshi Asami , cracauer@cons.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ELF transition for ports References: <19980917160149.A23619@cons.org> <199809180018.RAA16202@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i In-Reply-To: <199809180018.RAA16202@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Thu, Sep 17, 1998 at 05:18:46PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In <199809180018.RAA16202@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * My shells/scsh port doesn't even build on ELF and I don't think I can > * fix that until 3.0-RELEASE. > * > * What to do, is there a seperate BROKEN variable for ELF? > > What do you think about this one? What's what I had in mind first. I think that's a good thing to have in any case. Now I've got another idea: Can I rely on aout libraries to be present on 3.0 systems? If I find the time, I could modify the port so that it builds as aout even on machines with default == ELF. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 Paper: (private) Waldstrasse 200, 22846 Norderstedt, Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message