Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:19:42 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205475] [NEW PORT] x11-themes/gtk-E17-theme: Dark GTK theme for Enlightenment Message-ID: <bug-205475-13-0BGcgr7KHQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205475-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205475-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205475 matthew@reztek.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #164442|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from matthew@reztek.cz --- Created attachment 164454 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=164454&action=edit add port x11-themes/gtk-E17-theme The mention of poudriere testing prompted me to realize this should have NO_ARCH set. I assume it was an oversight that it is not set in the other theme ports I was cribbing from when putting this port together. /usr/ports/x11-themes/gtk-E17-theme # portlint -AC WARN: Makefile: Consider defining LICENSE. 0 fatal errors and 1 warning found. Portlint is happy except for license, which I can do nothing about. There is no mention of license in the distributed files at all. The website simply says "License: GPL", and while LICENSE=GPL makes portlint happy, it causes make to fail. Leaving it blank rather than trying to guess a GPL version. I guess some clarification is needed regarding the maintainer flag. I was previously told it should be set on ports without a maintainer, i.e. MAINTAINER=ports@FreeBSD.org. A new port also has no current maintainer so logically the same should apply. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205475-13-0BGcgr7KHQ>