From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Sat Apr 28 19:50:41 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15704FB81C5
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:50:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from hz.grosbein.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3517B71C3F
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:50:39 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be
 forged))
 by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w3SJoUnR035698
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Sat, 28 Apr 2018 21:50:31 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net
X-Envelope-To: ab.tariq90@gmail.com
Received: from [10.58.0.4] (dadv@[10.58.0.4])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w3SJoQqJ065681
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
 Sun, 29 Apr 2018 02:50:26 +0700 (+07)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Subject: Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help
To: Abdullah Tariq <ab.tariq90@gmail.com>
References: <CAPFxuwQOBkGTHZbGfJz=-fUW8M+QGOpTM9T+-RO6H4fWcGEtqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5AE216DC.7010905@grosbein.net>
 <CAPFxuwSEDTNhfn1+1nXPAC6skJt+dAych10FN9bwwBVdqevO2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <5AE33513.1000001@grosbein.net>
 <CAPFxuwRceDDoTw-4EohRdjUMSE-YN4YKWhbObuvEpxzEWOh2_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <5AE34754.6040905@grosbein.net>
 <CAPFxuwQ5TwZnnW+1TT7urq_0pgb=sM_VwH4x0eq0363MCdb7hw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5AE34CFA.7000207@grosbein.net>
 <CAPFxuwR54nPiKAAACRY5a_GvDNOVfdniqv6F_3PK4--7vm03uA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5AE437C1.8010706@grosbein.net>
 <CAFZYVy7_nVm5G1XDdM_TujN=jVbCyDEKABGbC=M9L5Lh1jAAzQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5AE44ADD.7020302@grosbein.net>
 <CAPFxuwQ=Gi7GiVr+sdTavr6r44ftaeFDOvN7+3qi_7aZyH6kXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5AE468D5.9030702@grosbein.net>
 <CAPFxuwRdLrEmtVHGSruja6L-bcOi0Z59ae5mB1gWgi-PvU6inw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Message-ID: <5AE4D082.2070107@grosbein.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 02:50:26 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPFxuwRdLrEmtVHGSruja6L-bcOi0Z59ae5mB1gWgi-PvU6inw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, LOCAL_FROM, RDNS_NONE,
 SPF_PASS,T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
 *  0.0 T_DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received:
 *      date
 * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 *      [score: 0.0000] *  2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains
 *  1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:50:41 -0000

28.04.2018 20:16, Abdullah Tariq wrote:

> Sorry but getting a little confused here. 
> Lets say i have 2 interfaces igb0, igb1 and i want them to have tagged traffic.
> I create vlan1 tagged 10 on igb0
> and vlan2 tagged 10 on igb1
> Next i create bridge0, assign vlan1 and vlan2 (no IPs on either the bridge, physical interface on VLANs)?  PCs connected with igb0 and igb1 have similar IP config (e.g 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.2)
> Am i correct?

Yes.