From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 13 20:17:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3393216A409 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from melon.pingpong.net (melon.pingpong.net [195.178.174.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9D213C4A7 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247605089B; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:17:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melon.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 71652-01-3; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:17:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (2-1-3-26a.asp.sth.bostream.se [82.182.24.220]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C606D50831; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:17:16 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <45D1F2B8.1010902@metro.cx> References: <45D1F2B8.1010902@metro.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8B134AFF-1472-4F68-8BD8-42C2462D26A8@pingpong.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Palle Girgensohn Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:17:14 +0100 To: Koen Martens X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pingpong.net Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: default postgresql 7.4 -> 8.1, OK? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:17:08 -0000 13 feb 2007 kl. 18.17 skrev Koen Martens: > Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> Hi! >> >> As the maintainer of the PostgreSQL ports, I'm planning a move to set >> the 8.1.x branch as the default version for FreeBSD. Now it is 7.4, >> which starts to get a bit rusty. >> >> Any objections? > > I'm all in favour of this. Any specific reason you're not moving to > the 8.2.x branch? I'm really just beeing modestly conservative, but the 8.2 branch is really too young to be the default branch, IMO. /Palle