Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 10:47:01 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav_?= <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com>, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com>, committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make.conf Message-ID: <19980901104701.C12912@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3Cxzpr9xwpx75=2Efsf=40grjottunagard=2Eifi=2Euio=2Eno=3E?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3B_from_Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav__on_Tue=2C_Sep_01?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2C_1998_at_01:07:26AM_%2B0200?= References: <1018.904492666@time.cdrom.com> <xzpr9xwpx75.fsf@grjottunagard.ifi.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> No. If I don't have a full source tree installed, but check out part > of the tree (say, 'cvs co ls') from my local copy of the repository, I > won't be able to compile it. If you have to put them i separate > directories, I'd suggest /etc/make/ ostl. VERY much agreed. I especially do this when fixing a port. (except for looking sysV by adding directories to /etc) -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980901104701.C12912>